This week: I try very hard not to become a fitness influencer, explain why your shoulders may not need another bloody hypertrophy block, and ask whether the body-planning system I built for trans women is useful, mad, necessary, or all three.

I get asked about my body quite a lot.

Not by random women in changing rooms, because this is not a Carry On film and I do not spend my life being erotically appraised beside a row of lockers.

It is mostly other trans women.

They see a photo. Or they read something I have written about training. Or they notice that I have somehow managed to get from a 108-kilo dad-shaped catastrophe to something that now reads much more like an actual female body, with hips and a waist and a bum and all the bits I spent most of my life assuming were simply not on the menu.

And then the question comes.

How did you do it?

I understand the question completely, because for trans women this is not just fitness. It is not beach-body nonsense. It is not about having visible abs so we can stand under a ring light drinking electrolyte water and pretending we discovered discipline.

For many of us, the body is one of the loudest things in the room.

It speaks before we do.

Before our voice, before our name, before our clothes, before our carefully practised walk through Tesco where we are trying to look casual while also monitoring every reflective surface like a meerkat with trauma.

Our shape announces things about us. Sometimes things we do not want announced.

So yes, when another trans woman asks me how I changed mine, I take it seriously.

I wrote about it properly in my earlier piece on building a great body in your forties, fifties and sixties. The system is all in there: diet, training, psychology, habit design, the whole slightly deranged architecture of how I rebuilt myself.

How To Build a Great Body as a Trans Woman (Even in Your 40s, 50s, or 60s)

But an article has a problem.

You can explain everything. You can pour your entire brain into three thousand words. Someone can read it, nod along, feel a little spark of hope, and then, two days later, be back at lunch having eaten the calories of a Victorian Christmas before 1pm and wondering why their shoulders are still auditioning for a rugby squad.

Knowing is not doing.

It never was.

So the next question started appearing.

Will you coach me?

And the answer is no.

Absolutely not.

Not because I do not care. I care a lot. That is the problem. If I took people on properly, I would care far too much, interfere far too much, overthink everything, write twelve-page explanations, and end up emotionally invested in someone’s lateral raise technique at midnight when I should be asleep.

Also, I do not want to become one of those online fitness people.

You know the model.

Nice body at the front. Payment link underneath. “Community” in a WhatsApp group. Then behind the curtain, everyone gets basically the same programme with their name pasted into the PDF and maybe a slightly different glute bridge variation if the coach is feeling festive.

I am being unfair, obviously. Some of them are good.

But a lot of it is nonsense. Very shiny nonsense. Nonsense with abs. Nonsense with a ring light and an affiliate code.

And for trans women, the problem is not merely that some online coaching is lazy. The deeper problem is that a lot of the default fitness advice is actively pointed in the wrong direction.

The hypertrophy problem

Most mainstream training programmes are built around hypertrophy.

Build muscle. Add volume. Progressive overload. Train hard. Push more weight. Chase the pump. Make everything bigger.

That is fine for some people. It is not morally wrong to build muscle. I am not standing here with a candle and a haunted expression saying “never touch a dumbbell.”

But for a lot of trans women, especially those of us who come to this later, the issue is not that we lack muscle everywhere.

It is that we already have too much of the wrong muscle in the wrong places.

I did not arrive at transition as a delicate little woodland creature. I arrived with years of sport in my body. Cycling, Ironman training, lifting, general male-life nonsense. Broad shoulders. Thick back. Traps and lats that had not received the memo that we were now trying to go in a different direction.

That upper-body shape read male before I opened my mouth.

So what does a generic hypertrophy programme do to a woman like that?

It preserves the problem.

It trains the shoulders. It trains the back. It trains the arms. It maintains the exact silhouette she is trying to soften, and then calls it progress.

Six months later she looks in the mirror, feels like nothing has shifted, and concludes that she has failed.

But she has not failed.

The programme failed her.

It was the wrong tool.

For many trans women, the answer is not “train harder.” It is more specific than that. Sometimes it is “train less there.” Sometimes it is “stop feeding that bit.” Sometimes it is “move the work downward.” Sometimes it is “we are not trying to build a bodybuilder, we are trying to change a silhouette.”

Glutes matter. Thighs matter. Core matters. Waist-to-hip matters. Fat loss matters. Softening matters. Cardio matters. Not in a punishment way, but in a body-composition way.

And, crucially, restraint matters.

That is the bit almost nobody sells, because it is very hard to charge someone £150 a month to tell them not to train their shoulders like a deranged canoeist.

But for some of us, that is exactly the advice.

The annoying part

Once you see this, you cannot unsee it.

You look at the available options and think: right, so the choices are either generic fitness apps designed for a population that does not have this problem, or online coaching that often looks trans-specific from the outside but still runs on the same bodybuilding engine underneath.

That annoyed me.

I am very good at being annoyed. Annoyance is one of my core productivity systems.

I did not want to coach people one by one. I still do not. I do not want clients. I do not want a WhatsApp group. I do not want to become the bum at the front of the sales funnel. Nobody needs that from me, least of all me.

But I also did not want to keep watching trans women get handed the wrong map.

Because there is a method here.

There is judgement. There is pattern recognition. There is a way of looking at a trans woman’s body, her goals, her history, her equipment, her hormones, her surgeries, her injuries, her time, and saying: right, this is what we are actually trying to do.

And that judgement is not magic.

It can be structured.

It can be encoded.

It can be turned into software.

So, because I am apparently incapable of seeing a practical problem without turning it into a platform, I built the machinery.

It is called Become.

What Become is

Become is a body-planning system for trans women.

That is the cleanest way I can describe it.

Not a generic fitness app with a trans option bolted on.

Not a chatbot that spits out workouts.

Not a spreadsheet with lipstick.

A proper body-planning system, built around the problems trans women actually face when we are trying to change our shape.

It starts from a simple idea: two women can look superficially similar and need completely different plans.

One might be early in transition and still able to build muscle quite easily.

Another might be years into hormones, post-surgery, and working with a completely different hormonal engine.

One might need to soften an overbuilt upper body.

Another might be under-muscled and need careful strength.

One might need fat loss and habit-building before anything else.

Another might already be lean and need lower-body shaping, posture work and refinement.

One might have a full gym.

Another might have resistance bands, a bedroom floor and twenty-five minutes before the dog starts eating a charger.

Those are not details.

They change the plan.

That is what Become is built around.

How it thinks, without boring everyone to death

Underneath Become is a decision system.

I am deliberately not going to explain every cog and sprocket, because nobody needs to read the full wiring diagram unless they are trying to steal it or fall asleep.

But the broad idea is this.

Become builds a multi-dimensional picture of you.

Not one crude label. Not “beginner.” Not “apple-shaped.” Not “fat loss client.” Not “trans woman, therefore glutes.”

A proper picture.

It looks at the things that genuinely change the mission of the plan: weight, upper-body muscle, feminisation, hormonal context, training history, consistency, aspiration, available time, injuries, surgeries and equipment.

Some of those things are core drivers.

Some are modifiers.

Some change the whole direction of the plan.

Some simply change the exercise selection.

That distinction matters.

A dodgy knee matters enormously, but it does not necessarily change what the plan is for. It changes how the plan is built safely. Carrying a large amount of upper-body muscle from a previous athletic life, on the other hand, may change the entire mission from “build” to “soften.”

That is the kind of judgement a good coach makes.

Become makes that judgement through a structured decision system.

The best shorthand is probably this: it is closer to a clinical triage model than a fitness quiz.

Not because it is a medical device. It is not.

But because the seriousness is closer to that world than to the usual “tell me your goal and I’ll generate a plan, babe” nonsense.

It does not ask you to diagnose yourself and then reward you with a PDF.

It reads the situation, weighs the relevant factors, and commits to a lane.

That lane defines what the plan is actually for.

Sometimes the mission is sustainable weight loss.

Sometimes it is habit-building first.

Sometimes it is upper-body softening.

Sometimes it is lower-body shaping.

Sometimes it is strength.

Sometimes it is posture and refinement.

Sometimes it is simply getting someone moving safely without overwhelming her life by Tuesday lunchtime.

That is the first major difference.

The plan is not built from a template.

It is built from the mission.

Where the AI fits

Now, I need to be careful with this bit, because the phrase “AI fitness app” makes me want to climb into a cupboard and live there with a torch.

Most AI fitness products are basically chatbots in a vest.

You ask for a plan, and the model improvises something plausible-looking from the internet’s giant soup of fitness advice. Sometimes it is fine. Sometimes it is nonsense. Sometimes it will cheerfully tell someone with a rebuilt shoulder to do overhead presses because the internet has lots of overhead presses in it and the chatbot woke up confident.

That is not what Become is.

The AI does not get to sit in the driver’s seat wearing sunglasses and making things up.

The important decisions are made by the underlying methodology: the decision trees, the rules, the constraints, the trans-specific logic, the things that stop the plan doing something stupid.

The AI is used where AI is genuinely useful.

It can help interpret body photos.

It can help understand what you say about yourself in your own words.

It can notice when your description adds something that a form field did not catch.

It can turn the system’s reasoning into clear, human language instead of producing a dead little gym PDF that sounds like it was written by a protein tub.

But it works inside fences.

It does not invent the whole plan from scratch.

It does not get to override the methodology because the vibes were strong that day.

That matters to me enormously.

I do not want a system that merely sounds clever.

I want a system that makes good decisions.

There is a huge difference.

The photo step

One of the things Become can do is look at body photos.

That sounds simple. It is not simple.

For trans women, body photos are not casual.

They are not “upload your transformation selfie, babe.”

They can be loaded, exposing, dysphoric, frightening and sometimes humiliating. I know that. I have lived that.

But they are also useful.

A real coach can see things from a body photo that no questionnaire will capture properly: shoulder width, upper-body mass, posture, waist, hips, fat distribution, muscle balance, the overall silhouette, the mismatch between where someone is now and where she wants to go.

Become uses that information as part of the assessment.

Not as content.

Not as social proof.

Not as a cute “before” picture.

As private intake.

The point is not vanity.

The point is accuracy.

Because a plan for a slim, under-muscled trans woman just starting out should not be the same as a plan for a former male athlete with broad shoulders, strong lats and a lower body that needs to catch up.

Obvious, you would think.

And yet here we are.

Why the plan explains itself

This is probably the part I care about most.

Become does not just tell you what to do.

It tells you why.

That sounds like a small distinction. It is not.

It is the difference between obedience and understanding.

A normal plan might say:

Face pulls, three sets of twelve.

Fine. Technically correct. Also completely disposable. The first busy week, that exercise is gone, because it is just another line on a list.

But suppose you have had breast augmentation and posture matters to you.

Then face pulls are not just a random gym accessory movement. They are doing a job.

The weight of implants sits forward. Over time, that can encourage the shoulders to round and the upper back to collapse. Face pulls strengthen the rear delts, mid-back and small stabilising muscles that help hold the shoulder girdle in a better position.

Now you understand why the exercise is there.

That makes it much more likely you will keep doing it.

The same applies everywhere.

If the system reduces upper-body training, it explains why.

If it biases glutes and thighs, it explains why.

If it avoids a movement because of your knee, your surgery history, your equipment or your goal, it explains why.

Not in gym-bro Latin.

In plain English.

Because women do not need to be barked at by PDFs.

They need to understand the logic well enough to trust it.

The part that matters most for trans women

There is one piece of this I care about more than almost anything else.

Become has to be honest internally.

It cannot build you the right plan if it lies to itself about where you are starting from. If the system needs to know that you are carrying a lot of upper-body muscle, it has to know that. If it needs to know that your body is early in feminisation, it has to know that too.

The machinery has to see the truth.

But the system does not have to throw every truth in your face.

That distinction is everything.

For trans women, body-read information does not land neutrally.

Some of it is useful.

Some of it is reassuring.

Some of it can go straight into the wound.

Being told, even gently, that your body reads less feminised than you hoped is not just “feedback.” For some women, that is a small emotional catastrophe. It is exactly the sort of thing that makes someone close the laptop and never come back.

So Become separates what the engine needs to know from what the user needs to hear.

Internally, it is honest.

Externally, it is careful.

It does not hand you a cruel little report card on your own dysphoria.

It does not say, “Here is your feminisation score, enjoy your afternoon.”

It uses that information to build a better plan, but it talks to you in terms of method, direction and opportunity.

That is not dishonesty.

That is care.

A doctor does not need to read your blood results out like a sports commentator. A good coach does not need to say every technically true thing that passes through her head. The point is not to display the system’s cleverness. The point is to help the woman in front of it.

And this is where I think being trans matters.

I know what that information can do when it lands badly.

I know what it is like for your own body to hurt your feelings before breakfast.

So the system is designed with that in mind.

Not bolted on afterwards.

Built in.

The machine is honest where honesty helps the plan.

It is gentle where bluntness would only hurt the person.

That, to me, is the difference between a fitness product that happens to have a trans option and a product actually built for us.

Why I am talking about it now

I have had Become simmering for a while, partly because I have been working like a dog.

Not “busy” in the LinkedIn humblebrag sense.

Actually busy.

Writing, building a lot of software, recovering, working, dealing with life and feeding a tiny dog

Become has been on the back burner.

It has not gone away.

And I am talking about it now because I want to know who actually wants it.

That is the honest reason.

I can sit in my software cave building elaborate systems until the walls start speaking C#, but at some point you have to put the thing in front of real people and ask:

Does this solve a problem you actually have?

Would you use it?

Would you trust it?

Because I know the problem is real.

I know the generic advice is not good enough.

I know trans women are out here trying to solve body problems that mainstream fitness does not understand and was never built to understand.

What I do not yet know is how many of you are waiting for something like this.

So this is partly me showing you the idea, and partly me asking.

For a stretch of my life, roughly eighteen to thirty, I was reckless.

Not charmingly reckless. Not the memoir sort, soft-focus photograph and a lesson at the end. Actually reckless. Drink, drugs at points, weight going all over the place, impulsive decisions, fast decisions, and a general sense that I was living in a body wired up by a bored electrician on a Friday afternoon.

The part people misunderstand about chaos is that it often coexists with ambition. I always wanted to be better. I wanted to drink less, stop smoking, get my weight under control, become the person I kept imagining in those bleak little moments after the damage was done, when the energy had gone out of the room and all that remained was the bill.

And every time, I did the same thing. I made a vow. *This time I mean it. This time I have learned.* Then I relied on the raw force of that vow to carry me through the next temptation, which is a beautiful system provided the temptation lasts about nine minutes and you are never tired, bored, lonely, ashamed, hungry, frightened, drunk, or alive.

So the pattern repeated. Decision, effort, collapse, shame, decision again. And I spent years thinking it was a character problem, that discipline was a thing other people had and I’d been issued the Poundland version. Some people had the proper moral engine. Mine had a warning light on and made a funny noise when cornering.

I now think I was wrong about almost all of it.

Not completely. Willpower is real. It can get you through the immediate moment, shove you back from the edge, survive the first exposed hour. But it is not a life system. It is sprint fuel.

Willpower runs on glycogen.

Forgive me. I came up with this at midnight and it involves exercise physiology.

Glycogen is the fast fuel: immediate access, high output, limited tank. It powers a sprint, a hard climb, the ridiculous decision to chase someone up a hill because your ego has briefly overruled your cardiovascular system. It’s brilliant and essential and it depletes hard. Burn through it and you hit the wall. You bonk. Your legs become two bags of wet sand and no amount of moral conviction will persuade them otherwise.

That is willpower exactly. It works beautifully for a while and then it empties, and once it’s gone you cannot motivational-quote your way around human biology. You cannot grit your teeth into a second liver.

And yet this is how most people try to change their lives, stop drinking, diet, get fit, fix their finances, their sleep, their phone, their entire personality, all on the same tiny emergency fuel source designed to get them through a short, sharp crisis. Then when the tank empties, they conclude they’re weak. They’re not weak. They’re running a marathon on sprint fuel. That was me for years. I wasn’t short of desire. If anything I had too much, which is why I kept designing transformation as a heroic event, the big decision, the clean line in the diary, the new version of me arriving with lighting, music and possibly a small brass section.

But human beings are not changed by speeches. We’re changed by systems.

The thing that made me think about all this again was drinking. Three weeks ago I stopped, after a year on and off the booze that followed about fifteen years of not drinking at all. And the strange thing is that it has been easy. Not white-knuckle easy, not “bravely staring into the middle distance” easy. Genuinely, boringly easy, not constitutionally easy, but system-easy, which is a different thing. I sit in the garden with cranberry and ginger in a wine glass, watch a documentary with tonic and berries, and fall asleep before I finish the second glass, like a deeply wholesome woodland creature with excellent glassware. A few weeks ago the same evenings would have ended in gin.

If that were willpower it would have collapsed by now. Willpower can get you through the first evening, maybe a week if you’re especially furious with yourself. It does not hum along quietly in the background for three weeks while you wonder whether the documentary about ancient trade routes is as good as the reviews said. So whatever is holding this, it isn’t willpower, which is what sent me down the rabbit hole of working out what self-control actually is.

The opposite of willpower is not weakness. It’s habit. Or more precisely, habit plus belief.

Habit and belief are the other fuel system. They’re fat oxidation: enormous tank, low effort, sustainable for years, but slow to build and frustratingly invisible while you’re building. It’s zone two training. It feels too easy to be doing anything. Nobody is filming a montage. You’re just there, repeating the thing, almost embarrassingly. And then weeks or months later you realise you can hold aerobically what used to take everything you had.

This is the bit I missed for years: I confused effort with effectiveness. I thought the thing that felt hardest must be the thing that was working, the burn, the strain, the enormous emotional charge of *never again*. It felt virtuous because it felt difficult. But most of what actually changes you doesn’t feel serious while it’s happening. It feels boring. Repetitive. Almost too small to matter. Which is exactly why people abandon it. The walk that isn’t very hard, the slightly better breakfast, the tonic in the same glass, the small act of not negotiating with yourself at six in the evening, none of it feels like transformation.

That’s because it isn’t transformation yet. It’s installation. And installation is boring.

One of the most useful things I’ve learned is that you often have to saturate yourself in the thing you’re trying to become. You cannot hear the truth once and expect it to rewire you. You have to drown in it, repeat it, bore yourself half to death with it, until the message stops being a message and becomes part of the weather.

That’s how I stopped smoking. I read Allen Carr’s book, which at the time I thought might be the worst-written book in human history, the same points over and over until I wanted to climb out of my own skull. *Yes, mate, you’ve mentioned this. The point has been made. The point has bought a holiday cottage and is now living in the village.* And then I stopped smoking. Years later I realised the repetition wasn’t a flaw. It was the mechanism. The book wasn’t trying to impress me. It was trying to seep into me.

Alastair Campbell said something similar about politics. You repeat the line until you’re sick of hearing yourself. New Labour, new Britain. By the time everyone inside the campaign is bored rigid of it, the public are only just beginning to hear it. Behaviour change works the same way, except the electorate is your own nervous system. You have to campaign at yourself, not once, not with one grand manifesto launch in the bathroom mirror, but again and again until the new message becomes more available than the old one. Familiar, then available, then plausible, then normal, then obvious. That’s the order. Most people want to jump straight to obvious.

They want to *become* the person who doesn’t drink, doesn’t binge, doesn’t spiral. But identity isn’t updated by declaration. It’s updated by evidence. Every day the habit holds, it produces evidence; the evidence updates who you think you are; the updated self-concept makes the next day cheaper, because you’re no longer overriding an impulse with the same force, you’re acting like the person you’ve begun to believe you are. Day one, you’re a person trying not to drink. Day twenty-one, you’re a person who doesn’t. Completely different operating cost. The first is expensive. The second is nearly free.

This is where belief compounds. Every small repetition pays a tiny dividend, one walk, one decent meal, one early night, one bottle not opened. Nothing with cinematic value. But the dividend reinvests. The behaviour creates evidence, the evidence changes belief, the belief makes the behaviour easier, the easier behaviour creates more evidence. Slowly at first. Then suddenly load-bearing.

I know compounding. from trading and investing. The money I made, I made from boring positions held for years, compounding quietly while I got on with my life. The money I lost, I lost from high-intensity, high-leverage strategies that produced spectacular numbers right up until they tried to remove my face.

Leverage is glycogen. Compounding is fat oxidation. And it’s the same story in three costumes. In fitness, the mistake is training everything anaerobically because suffering feels like work, you batter yourself, plateau, and decide you’re not fit enough, when really you never built the aerobic base. In behaviour, the mistake is changing everything through willpower because effort feels like virtue, you vow, strain, deplete, relapse, and decide you’re weak, when really you never built the habit base. In investing, the mistake is chasing intensity because movement feels like intelligence, you lever up, trade too much, and discover that spectacular numbers go in both directions, the little bastards, when really you never respected compounding. Different fields, same lesson: the thing that feels powerful often can’t last, and the thing that lasts often feels embarrassingly underpowered at the start.

So I’ve stopped asking “how do I become stronger in the moment?” Sometimes that matters; sometimes you genuinely need the sprint fuel to get through the next ten minutes without doing the stupid thing. But the deeper question is different. How do I make the moment less expensive? How do I design the evening so the decision isn’t heroic? How do I preserve the ritual while changing the payload?

That’s why the glass matters. It sounds ridiculous but it doesn’t. The cranberry and ginger in the wine glass preserves the shape of the old ritual while removing the part that was harming me. Same chair, same evening, same tiny ceremony, different chemical payload. That’s a system. And systems beat vows, because a vow says *I will be different* and a system says *I have made different easier*. That’s the whole game.

Which is why I’ve become wary of the word discipline, not because it’s bad, but because people use it as though it were a moral substance some people are issued more of. I don’t think that’s how it works. What looks like discipline is usually architecture. The disciplined person isn’t standing there in permanent heroic restraint. She has simply built better defaults and exposed fewer stupid decisions to the weather. That’s not moral superiority. It’s infrastructure. And the good news about infrastructure is that it can be built, slowly, repetitively, without brass sections.

If I were trying to change something now, I wouldn’t start by asking how much willpower I have. I’d assume the answer is: about the same as everyone else, which is not much, and nowhere near enough to run a life. Then I’d ask better questions. What’s the smallest version of this I can repeat? What ritual am I preserving, and what payload needs to change? What do I need to saturate myself in until the new idea becomes boringly available? And above all: how do I stop confusing strain with progress?

Because the first weeks of change are deceptive. The system adapts before you can see the adaptation. You don’t expect one zone two session to turn you into a diesel engine, you do the boring work and trust that something is happening beneath the level of drama. Behaviour is the same. The first repetitions don’t feel like identity change. They feel like faffing about with tonic water and pretending it’s a personality. Too small, too domestic, too easy.

Good. Easy isn’t cheating. Easy is the point. The goal was never to prove I could suffer. It was to build something that doesn’t need suffering as its fuel.

That may be the most important thing I’ve learned. Willpower can start change. It cannot carry it. Habit carries it, belief carries it, saturation installs it, compounding strengthens it. And after a while the thing you used to fight becomes the thing you barely think about, which is the closest thing to freedom most of us are going to get.

I spent my reckless years thinking I lacked discipline. Then I spent years, without quite realising it, building better systems, fitness, food, work, health, thinking. I read, watched, repeated, failed, adjusted, repeated again. I bored myself into becoming someone else. So now, when something changes easily, I don’t mistake it for magic. I assume the groundwork was already there, and the visible decision was only the moment the system surfaced.

That’s what happened with the drinking. I didn’t discover a heroic reservoir of willpower. I’d spent years changing the machinery underneath. The old evening arrived and simply didn’t find the old infrastructure waiting for it.

For years I thought self-control meant gripping the wheel harder. Now I think it means building a better road.

Willpower is useful. But it’s glycogen. It gets you over the hill. It doesn’t take you across the country.

I’ve got half a dozen Substacks sitting in my drafts folder like abandoned Lego sets. Towers missing pieces, half-built spaceships, one good idea perched next to three piles of waffle. I quite like it. Ideas need to stew and I like wandering back to them when something clicks. Today something clicked.

Before I say anything else, I know I’m going to annoy a few people. I will await the Reddit pushback, the “this is AI”, “you’re a shill”, “this isn’t real”, “there’s no trans woman called Stevie Bennett”. I have heard all of this before!! You can’t please everybody, so I will speak the truth.

I’m going to show three photos.

One of me pre-transition, at my most muscular.

And two of me now.

And I’m not going to pretend: the body transformation is not pretty bloody good. I’m in my late fifties and I’ve achieved something quite rare. I sense, now and then, a flicker of resentment. The odd comment about money, surgery, luck. I get it. But the truth is that even before surgery I was 41, 33, 41. And once I got serious, I brought my waist to 28 and nudged my hips into the low forties. Surgery refined what was there. It didn’t conjure anything out of thin air.

You cannot get amazing surgical results unless the underlying structure is decent. That applies to cis women, trans women, everyone.

And here’s the thing: I didn’t start transition in peak condition. I’d drifted into an old dad bod. The injuries had piled up. A complex meniscus tear in my knee. Damaged vertebrae in my lower back from bad deadlift form. A minor cardiac issue from too much endurance training well into my forties. My triathlon days were done. My long-distance cycling days were done. That broke my heart, but the reality was my body had quietly changed shape and I had to deal with it.

But what I did still have was something vital: I’d done this before.

Years earlier, I’d taken myself from nearly 280 pounds to a lean endurance cyclist. I knew how to set goals, break them into pieces, track macros, build training cycles, decide KPIs. I knew how to make a body do something it wasn’t designed to do.

That skill, not genetics or money, is what saved me.

Losing Weight: The Unromantic Bit

When I started transitioning and went on estrogen, I did something very simple. I stopped looking at other trans women and started observing women my age. Real women. Women in their fifties who were slim, elegant, composed.

I watched how they ate.

At parties, they’d cut a slice of cake so tiny you’d think it was a misprint. Hours later they might take a single extra corner. To the casual observer it looks like “Oh, she’s been nibbling cake all afternoon.” In reality, it’s surgical precision. Moderation disguised as indulgence.

And it wasn’t just the cake. I’d watch their plates at meals. The portions were small. Deliberate. They’d take two potatoes, never three. They’d load up on vegetables, not as some performative health gesture, but because that was simply how they ate. Their plates were light. They didn’t build these enormous, heaped constructions the way men often do. They ate slowly, purposefully, like people who had long ago accepted that food is not a recreational sport.

To anyone who genuinely loves food, this is a sacrifice. A real one. There’s no point pretending otherwise. But the truth is this: this is how thin women eat. Not all of them, not every day, but often enough that the pattern is unmistakable. It’s not magic, and it’s not metabolism. It’s behaviour.

I realised I had to do the same.

At the start of my transition, I was a whopping 108 kilos (238 lbs). I had gotten a bit fat!!

I needed to lose sixty lbs. So I created a narrow corridor of calories and walked through it. Fourteen hundred calories a day, then twelve hundred, for seven or eight months. Since then I’ve eased off but the weight still drifts down gently. I’m essentially the weight I want to be now, 78kg (170 lbs). A pound or two less would be nice, but that’s universal female vanity speaking.

What’s sad is how clearly I can see the mistakes others make.

Mistake one: eating like a man.

I’ve been around some trans women and I’ve watched this happen over and over again. Full-fat soft drinks. Going back for seconds and thirds. Full fried breakfasts. Huge portions. Fifteen hundred calories before lunchtime. And here’s the bit nobody seems to grasp.

Once you’re on oestrogen, your muscle mass drops. It’s normal. It’s part of the process. But when your muscle drops, the amount of calories your body burns just by existing drops with it. That number is called your maintenance calories. In scientific terms it’s TDEE, total daily energy expenditure, but all it really means is the amount of food you can eat without gaining or losing weight.

If your maintenance level was around 2,200 calories before transition, it might be only 1,600 afterwards. You simply can’t eat like you used to. The maths changes. Most people ignore the maths.

Mistake two: clinging to male gym culture.

Some trans women cannot stop chasing hypertrophy. They were gym rats for decades and they cannot let go of the pre-transition rhythm of volume, pump, shoulder caps, traps. They want to be women but they want to train like men.

A muscular cis woman can still look feminine. A muscular trans woman often can’t. Our margins are narrower. Big deltoids plus a trans frame reads very quickly as masculine. So you have to train wisely. Not starve your upper body, but train it down, soften it, shift the proportions so your silhouette reads correctly.

Momentum And Belief

My transition was fast. That helped. Momentum is real. People four or five years in who haven’t got the body they want often lose belief. It’s the same psychology as long-term weight gain, diet, relapse, diet, relapse, and eventually the belief drains away. When belief drains away, adherence collapses.

The trick is to build systems that don’t require belief.

How I Actually Did It

Diet, diet, diet - 90%

This is not a prescription. I’m not telling anyone what they “must” do. This is simply how I did it.

Ninety per cent of your eventual figure comes from diet. Movement matters, but diet is the keystone. Brisk walks and pink dumbbells won’t build a waist. Food will.

The second truth: motivation is useless. Everyone starts motivated. Motivation evaporates. It always does.

The solution

One: immersion

Years ago, when I quit smoking, I read the Allen Carr book ‘Easy way to stop smoking’ and I remember thinking it was the most repetitive, tedious, badly written thing I had ever endured. I couldn’t believe something that sounded as though it had been written by an eight-year-old could possibly work. But it did. And the reason it worked is because the repetition isn’t a flaw, it’s the method. It’s immersion. It bypasses willpower entirely.

That was the penny-drop moment for me. Willpower does not work. Not for long. Not for anything that requires months of consistent behaviour. You can walk up to a fridge and chant, “I’m not eating cake today,” but that kind of internal heroism lasts a couple of days at best. Then it dissolves. Willpower is a short, sharp burst of nitrous oxide. It’s what you use for the final half-mile of a bike race, or to squeeze out the last bit of effort in an emergency. It is not what carries you through seven months of caloric discipline or body re-composition.

Long-term consistency comes from the subconscious, not the conscious mind. And the subconscious only learns through saturation. The trick is to overwhelm the conscious mind the thinking mind with so much information, so much repetition, such a constant stream of the same message, that it leaks downward and rewires your deeper patterns. That’s where behaviour changes stick. That’s where belief forms. That’s where discipline comes from, even when you don’t feel particularly disciplined.

So I did exactly that with nutrition. I immersed myself. I read Peter Attia, Outlive, Huberman, metabolic studies, endocrinology papers, longevity research, everything. I soaked my brain in it until the ideas no longer felt like concepts I was trying to remember, but truths I instinctively acted upon. Once your subconscious buys in, you don’t need motivation. You simply behave differently.

And there’s another part to this that people often forget, which Robert Greene writes brilliantly about in Mastery. Every new skill begins with an apprentice phase where you know nothing and feel useless. Then, slowly, you move into the practising phase where you make progress but still feel clumsy and inconsistent. Eventually, if you keep going, you cross into mastery—the point where the behaviour is automatic and integrated, and you can do it without thinking about it at all.

Diet is exactly the same. You have to accept being the apprentice. Accept that you don’t yet know what you’re doing. Accept that you will be clumsy and frustrated. But if you immerse yourself long enough, the subconscious takes over. Then you don’t need willpower because you have something far more powerful: embodied, automatic belief. The behaviour simply becomes who you are.

Two: Remove decisions.

Most people have the same breakfast every day. They don’t consciously decide. They don’t wake up each morning thinking, “Hmm, what shall I have today? Perhaps I’ll roast some vegetables, assemble a little panini, whip up a feta salad, maybe a fruit compote while I’m at it.” No. They grab toast. They grab cereal. They autopilot it.

So extend that principle. Take that same autopilot into lunchtime as well.

I designed the most nutritious 180-calorie breakfast possible. I worked out the exact macros. Then I ate it every day without thinking.

Lunch was a giant mackerel salad. Mountains of spinach. A rainbow of vegetables. Exactly fifty grams of mackerel, no more. A splash of Korean sauce. Repeat, repeat, repeat. 380 calories.

And dinner? I kept that simple. I ate whatever my family were eating. Obviously this was back in the days when I actually had a family before they threw me out for being transgender a long story for another day but the principle still stands. I didn’t cook some separate, monkish little meal for myself. I sat with them, I ate with them, and I just adapted the portion.

The rule was: it had to fit on a side plate. Nothing bigger. I’d cut the carbs down, pile on whatever veg was going, and fit the rest around it. But the key thing was the plate. A side plate enforces the portion without turning dinner into a maths lesson.

And there was something else I learned the hard way: if you live with other people, you can’t shove your weird dietary habits onto them. They will get annoyed. Food is ritual. It’s social glue. People sit down together and share the same meal, and if you suddenly declare, “I only eat steak and eggs now, sorry,” and then repeat that every night like some carnivore evangelist, they will eventually want to throttle you.

I know this because I did it. I’d been on extreme keto diets, carnivore diets where I insisted on nothing but steak and eggs, bodybuilder diets where I limited myself to chicken, broccoli and rice, nights where I’d scrape half my plate aside because it wasn’t “allowed.” It doesn’t work. Your family will strangle you. Eating is communal. You need to be flexible. The diet has to fit around your life, not bulldoze through everyone else’s.

So that’s it. Dead simple. No tricks.

Two out of three meals on autopilot and designed to perfection. One meal a free-for-all, but portion controlled. And that’s it.

Seven days a week I lived inside that loop. On Fridays I allowed myself one packet of crisps, purchased as part of our weekly, almost ritualistic Friday treats after school. I’d pull up in the pickup truck, my daughter would jump out and run in to get ice creams, drinks and crisps for herself and her siblings. And every week she’d emerge with a single, solitary packet just for me. I would take it home, open it with the reverence of someone unwrapping a Willy Wonka chocolate bar in search of the golden ticket, and then eat those crisps as though they were Michelin-starred amuse-bouches. I practically salivated over them. Those little moments kept me sane.

Once the routine locked in, the weight came off predictably. Body fat moved. Shape altered. That was the real foundation for everything that came later.

Training: The Physique Architecture Bit — 10%

Strength matters. Although I’ve said that training only gives you about ten per cent of your feminine look, that figure is misleading if you think long-term. Yes, the visual return is small at the start. Strength work won’t give you curves or a waist or hips in the short run. But in the long run, it’s non-negotiable. Strength is what protects you in your fifties, sixties, seventies and beyond. If you don’t train strength, you decline faster. You lose independence earlier. And the future version of you will pay the price.

And let’s be honest, for those of us transitioning later in life, the longer we can remain hot chicks, the better. We didn’t get to be 22-year-old women. We’ve only got the years we’ve got left, and the fitter and stronger we can stay, the longer we get to enjoy being our actual selves.

Everyone starts from a different base. Some women begin transition with very little muscle. I began with far too much in the wrong places. My upper body was overly developed from years of sport. That silhouette read “male” from fifty yards away.

So in my case, I made a deliberate choice: for the first six months I didn’t lift anything with my upper body. I let it atrophy. Once the volume softened, then I reintroduced strength work at half my old loads but with similar volume.

I shifted my training downwards glutes, thighs, core. My strong cycling thighs helped, but I doubled down on glute work to pull my proportions lower and widen my visual base.

Everyone’s needs differ. Some need to build. Some need to shrink. But if you were athletic as a man, you’ll likely need to reduce upper-body training unless you want a deliberately muscular female look. Personally, I’d rather have Anne Hathaway’s arms than a docker’s.

Posture, Gait, Silhouette

One thing nobody tells you: posture is a feminiser.

Pelvic tilt.

Shoulder position.

Scapular glide.

Centre of gravity.

Gait.

When you strengthen glutes, loosen the chest, allow the shoulders to drop, and walk from the hips rather than the lats, everything changes. People obsess over hormones and dresses. They should obsess more over posture. It’s free and transformative.

Skin, Soft Tissue, Ageing

Body composition also includes skin.

Oestrogen helps, but collagen declines with age.

Rapid weight loss can slacken tissue.

So I kept protein high.

Hydration high.

Soft-tissue health supported.

Curves matter, but so does the surface they sit on.

Identity Friction

People don’t fail because they’re lazy. They fail because their identity is fighting them. If you still subconsciously see yourself as a man trying to lose weight, your behaviour will sabotage you.

The day your identity settles, “I am a woman building a woman’s body”, everything clicks. Behaviour aligns automatically.

Longevity: The Long Game

Everything I did, I did for the future.

Less mass = less joint stress.

Glute and core strength = fewer falls.

Better balance = more independence.

A tighter frame = easier ageing.

Final Thoughts

None of this is magic. None of it is luck. And none of it was some genetic blessing I secretly had tucked away. It was a system, one that anyone can build.

A diet you don’t have to think about.

A routine you can repeat.

A training plan that nudges your body into the proportions you want.

A mind shaped by immersion rather than unreliable willpower.

Bodies are systems. Systems can be steered.

Even at fifty-six.

Even with injuries.

Even with a rocky starting point and a whopping 108kg.

And if you’re trans, you already have the most important ingredient: courage. The courage to transition. The courage to face yourself. The courage to rebuild your life from the ground up. Compared to that, refining your diet and training is just another skill , one you can pick up exactly the way you picked up everything else.

I’m not special. I built a pattern. I stuck to it. You can build your own. It won’t look exactly like mine. It doesn’t need to. But if you build the system, the system will carry you. And one day, not instantly, not magically, but inevitably, you will look in the mirror and see a woman who feels like the truest version of you.

The version you’ve always hoped would appear.